Talking Badly about Birth Parents in Front of Adopted Child
I spent some time this morning catching up on comments that were posted over the weekend. Some of the comments that were posted on our Giveaway message got my hackles raised, so I am climbing up onto my soapbox. I agree with what the readers posted about what needs to change in the adoption world and want to expound upon those comments on my blog.
One comment with which I agree said…
Oh yes, I'm sure I will feel plenty of anger at the injustice of what my future kids will have surely been through. That said, I don't think it's helpful to express that openly, especially in front of the kids. Nor do I think it's helpful when other people make assumptions about what the birthparents may have done (or not done, for that matter). - Snafu Suz at Our First Giveaway - Enter Now!
I do not understand why some people think it is okay to say whatever they want about a child's birth parents right in front of the child. I have friends who have been through divorces and now have deadbeat ex-husbands who do not pay their child support regularly. I would never bring this topic up in front of the children. I have a friend whose ex-husband moved to a different country, is living with a woman and is actively involved with her three kids, and who barely sees his own children (maybe once or twice a year for a few hours). You can imagine my opinion about his choices, but I would never talk about it in front of the children.
So, why do people think it is okay to speculate about the choices of birth parents in front of an adopted child? In both cases, we are talking about the choices of biological parents, and our words have the power to harm the child. I do not understand why people make a distinction about the appropriateness of slamming on a biological parent just because one child is adopted and another is not.
As for speculation about birth parents – That is a topic that gets me going, too. Most people seem to believe that the only women who would place a baby for adoption are young, single, and poor. While that profile might fit some birth mothers, it certainly does not fit all.
I get annoyed when people assume that my son was "conceived in sin" because he was born to an unwed mother. How do they know that his birth parents were "unwed"? Perhaps his birth mother was married to an abusive husband and placed her baby for adoption to protect him from abuse. Perhaps the birth parents already had more children than they could care for on a limited income and wanted to provide a "better life" for the baby. Perhaps the birth parents had a surprise pregnancy late in life and were not physically healthy enough to raise a baby. Do not make assumptions about whether my son was "conceived in sin" based upon that fact that he was placed for adoption.
Remember the movie The Bad News Bears? That is where I learned about the real meaning of assume. People only "make an ass out of u and me" when they make assumptions about situations with limited information.
Related forum:
Interaction with those outside adoption triad
Photo credit: Lynda Bernhardt
- FaithA's blog
- Login or register to post comments



RIGHT ON FAITH!
I do not speak ill of my adopted stepson's mother when he is around. We never have. My opinion of her is my opinion, and does not need to be shared with him. He asked me once what I thought about her, and I told him that what I thought about her doesn't matter, it is what he thinks and feels about her that matters. He smiled, and then said "well, she hates you." She was quite free with speaking ill of both my husband and myself to him, to the point where he cried all the way home (several hours) from a visit with her. He had asked her to stop talking bad about us, because it was really hurting his feelings and her reply was 'tough sh_t.'
That particular time, when she had really let it fly on how she felt about us to him, while he was trapped in the car with no way to escape, really damaged their relationship. They had other issues with each other as well, but that was definitely one of those 'things will never be the same' moments for him.
Tough for your son
As you demonstrate--saying mean things about another party does not hurt their relationship, but hurts OUR relationship. Your bmom didn't hurt your relationship with your son, she just hurt hers. And though kids don't always get the complexity, they seem to have an uncanny ability to "see through" people, and over time the reality shows itself clearly.
Its both what you say and where you say it
Context. No, you don't bad mouth the parents in front of the child. You also need to be careful about the pollyanna thing to the general public, inculding blogs, and particularly where social workers will pick up on it. Abusive birth parents are people who did bad things to their child. The current fad in social work is open adoption, and yes, workers would love to think that the time is right to make open adoption a part of all adoptions, even in abuse situations. The TPR is issued because the court finds that the parents are unacceptably bad parents, and that they cannot be rehabilitated. They are not good people and they are not people that should have contact with the child. Your first duty is to keep the child safe. The one set of people the child knows are unsafe are those birthparents.
The 'all members of the triad are wonderful people that we all need to support', which the commenter was reponding to, is simply not correct. For what its worth Faith, the commenter was talking about kids being adopted from foster care, not infant adoption. We do need to be frank and realisic in talking about abusive birth parents, where it is not about particular individuals. The surest way to elimiate most foster kids being adopted is to have delighted social workers insisting that now child contact with the TPRed parents will be a condition of adoption. Most families will simply give a pass. John
PS I do hope that Snafu Suz will not dismiss the abuse suffered by the children placed with her as glibly as she seems to with "That said...". Abuse is bad and not inconsequential.
Badmouthing vs. telling the truth
Badmouthing is running off at the mouth in a nasty way, when it is neither kind nor appropriate. Telling the truth is a whole different story. Children of abuse often cling to fantasies about their birth families, that impair their ability to heal. Telling the truth, even when it is painful, can be enormously helpful to these children. And yes John, it is our responsibility to protect our children from contact with bad birth relatives. We can only hope that if they decide to reunite in adulthood, our children will have healed enough to process it in a healthy way.
As far as damaged goes, the truth is, that our children have in fact been severely damaged by the abuse and trauma they have suffered at critical times in their lives. No, I don't want people calling my children that, nor do I want their history trotted out for any interested (nosy) party. But to deny the damage, is like burying your head in the sand. I get ANGRY at the damage my child's bio family has done to them, and I do NOT always hide this anger. My child needs to know that what was done to them was wrong, and outrageous, and SOMEONE is outraged. I believe this is a very critical starting point in their healing.
I agree
I gree with John, it is important to differentiate between birthparents who made the choice to terminate parental rights--put the good of the child above their feelings, and parents who were so abusive or negligent that the rights were terminated. In the first case, even people who appear to be mixed up, crazy, wacky, and lead whatever kind of life deserve respect, if only for their choice to give their children a better life. In the latter case, it's actually a little backward to give respect to someone who has shown nothing but disrespect to a child.
I think in cases of abuse or neglect, it is a difficult line to walk--on one hand, it's important to talk about the fact that what happened to the child is not their fault (making the bio parents look good suggests the kids were bad), but on the other hand, will the children believe that "I came from bad, so I am bad"? I also think it's possible to tell children the truth (as appropriate for their age) while also being kind. For example, you don't have to say a bio parent was a real SOB, you could explain that s/he was selfish, and made choices that hurt the child.
hang on a sec
First let me say that the delay in my response is due to the fact that I recently had surgery and have been out of commission. I know my response may get missed because it is so late but I couldn’t leave John’s comment without a rebuttal.
“I do hope that Snafu Suz will not dismiss the abuse suffered by the children placed with her as glibly as she seems to with "That said...". Abuse is bad and not inconsequential.”
Hang on a sec John, that personal jab to me at the end of your comment is not fair nor is it helpful, not to mention the fact that you totally misunderstood what I was saying in the first place. I am not glib about abuse and don’t appreciate the implication.
My point was that I don't think it helps in the child's healing to bad mouth their parents in front of them. Show healthy outrage? Yes. Be truthful about their abuse? Absolutely and without question. Say to your child that their birthfamily is a bunch of good-for-nothing dirt bags? Harmful, not helpful.
I DO expect that I will feel anger. I DO know that abuse is bad and not inconsequential. Though I was not removed from my home, I suffered abuse as a child (sexual, emotional and otherwise) so I know firsthand the suffering of an abused child. I also understand, as a child of abuse myself, that even abused kids love their parents. As an adoptive parent I need to respect my child’s unconditional love for their birthfamily. If I bad mouth them (which scrapsbynobody nicely defined as “running off at the mouth in a nasty way, when it is neither kind nor appropriate”) I will only put a wedge between my child and myself and hinder their ability to heal. THAT is what I meant by my comment.
So to reassure you, I fully intend to be open and honest with my child about the painful truth of their past, while doing so in a way that respects their unconditional love for their birthfamily.
I have not adopted yet and am fully aware that I have a lot to learn. I know that just because I lived abuse doesn’t necessarily mean I automatically know how to parent a child of abuse. So I am learning as much as I can by reading books, going to class after class, and frequenting blogs such as this one. I truly do appreciate and welcome feedback and suggestions from the experienced parents on this blog. If you think I am off on my thinking, then please, tell me so. I want to learn and like all parents I want to be the best parent I can be. I do not, however, appreciate unnecessary jabs and negative assumptions about how I will parent my children. John, if you want to challenge something I – or anyone else on this blog – has said, then please do so respectfully.
Welcome back
I am sorry to hear about your surgery. I hope that you are fully recovered now.
I will write about this topic next week and reference this dialogue so your comment does not get "lost." I think this is a good topic -- the balancing act of supporting the child while, at the same time, not sugarcoating the abuse.
On a completely different note, I LOVE your avatar. What a cute dog!!
- Faith
++++++++++
We must BE the change we wish to see in the world. - Ghandi
thanks
Thanks Faith, that is one of my two beloved dogs. I like the pic because he looks like he's smiling. He had been swimming all afternoon at the park so I like to think he actually was smiling. :)
Indeed
The part of your comment "That said..." seemed quite clear Suz, it has taken a rather long corrective comment to do the reframing. Just as you are offended by people who don't agree with the point you are making, I am offended by folks who say or seem to say, abuse is just not that big a deal, get over it. My sons get to live with the results, abuse stinks.
You write strongly stated opinions, that is good. It moves the process along. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. People may disagree strongly with strong opinions, that is part of the territory. I did not mean to hurt your feelings, I did mean to strongly disagree with what seemed to be your position. John
not offended
Just as you are offended by people who don't agree with the point you are making...
I am not offended if people disagree with my opinions or points. Healthy dialogue and debate is always a good thing. What I didn't appreciate was the personal jab. It's one thing to say, "I don't agree with you; here's what I think" and quite another to say snarkily, "I do hope that Snafu Suz will not dismiss the abuse suffered by the children placed with her as glibly as she seems to with 'That said...'" I mean c'mon John, it sure sounds like you are making assumptions about my character and how I will parent. That's just not productive. Your whole comment was well-stated until you added your PS.
As for "that said", I find it interesting that out of my whole comment that was the one thing that seemed to stick out to you more than anything. I write two blogs myself and I often use the term "that said". I don't mean it as a dismissive term; it simply is another form of the word "however". I.e., "Point A is an excellent one, however, point B is also important to consider." That's all that "that said" means, at least when I say it. It's not meant to negate or dismiss anything.
And no, you didn't hurt my feelings and I agree with you that strongly stated options get us all thinking and move the process along. You stated a strong opinion in your PS and since it was directed specifically at me I felt the need for a rebuttal. I'm just asking that we don't jab each other. We're all on the same team - we are adoptive or soon-to-be adoptive parents who want to do the best we can for our kids. Let's challenge each other in healthy discussions without poking at each other personally. That's all I'm saying.
By the way, we're actually in agreement about abuse but we've had a disconnect somewhere. I'll reply to you in email about that.
Susan
PS - John, I sure hope...... just kidding. :)
I hate when babies are
I hate when babies are refered to as mistakes. Babies are not mistakes. They are miracles, regardless of how they are concieved.
But, it's true. it's all so complicated. We are all just people trying to do our best. Judgement is not needed. It doesn't help.
Still, facing the truth with an abused child is a different subject. i can't help but feel rage at the abuse of a child, regardless of the parent's circumstances.
Not mistakes
In the book "The Purpose Driven Life," the author says that there are no unplanned babies, only unplanned parents because God plans all babies.
Re: child abuse -- Yep. I get very angry when I learn about a child being harmed.
- Faith
++++++++++
We must BE the change we wish to see in the world. - Ghandi